Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Bayat, M.
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheComparative study of two different hydrogen redistribution strategies along a fluidized-red hydrogen permselective membrane reactor for methanol synthesis / Rahimpour, M. R. in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, Vol. 49 N° 2 (Janvier 2010)
[article]
in Industrial & engineering chemistry research > Vol. 49 N° 2 (Janvier 2010) . - pp 472–480
Titre : Comparative study of two different hydrogen redistribution strategies along a fluidized-red hydrogen permselective membrane reactor for methanol synthesis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Rahimpour, M. R., Auteur ; Bayat, M., Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : pp 472–480 Note générale : Chimie industrielle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Hydrogen Permselective membrane reactor. Résumé : In this work, two different hydrogen redistribution strategies along a bubbling fluidized-bed hydrogen permselective membrane reactor have been compared. In the first strategy, fresh synthesis gas flows in the tube side of the fluidized-bed membrane reactor in cocurrent mode with reacting material in the shell side, so that more hydrogen is provided in the first segments of the reactor. In the second strategy, fresh synthesis gas flows in the tube side of the fluidized-bed membrane reactor in countercurrent mode with reacting material in the shell side, so that more hydrogen is provided in the last segments of the reactor. A dynamic two-phase theory in the bubbling regime of fluidization was developed to model and compare two strategies from different points of view. Comparison between cocurrent and countercurrent modes of operation shows that the reactor in the countercurrent configuration operates with higher conversion of methanol, longer catalyst life, and higher carbon dioxide removal, whereas the reactor in the cocurrent configuration operates with higher carbon monoxide removal, lower water production, and higher hydrogen permeation rate. Enhancement of the carbon dioxide removal in countercurrent mode and the carbon monoxide removal in cocurrent mode causes a lower environmental impact. The lower water production rate in cocurrent mode reduces catalyst recrystallization. DEWEY : 660 ISSN : 0888-5885 En ligne : http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie9005113 [article] Comparative study of two different hydrogen redistribution strategies along a fluidized-red hydrogen permselective membrane reactor for methanol synthesis [texte imprimé] / Rahimpour, M. R., Auteur ; Bayat, M., Auteur . - 2010 . - pp 472–480.
Chimie industrielle
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Industrial & engineering chemistry research > Vol. 49 N° 2 (Janvier 2010) . - pp 472–480
Mots-clés : Hydrogen Permselective membrane reactor. Résumé : In this work, two different hydrogen redistribution strategies along a bubbling fluidized-bed hydrogen permselective membrane reactor have been compared. In the first strategy, fresh synthesis gas flows in the tube side of the fluidized-bed membrane reactor in cocurrent mode with reacting material in the shell side, so that more hydrogen is provided in the first segments of the reactor. In the second strategy, fresh synthesis gas flows in the tube side of the fluidized-bed membrane reactor in countercurrent mode with reacting material in the shell side, so that more hydrogen is provided in the last segments of the reactor. A dynamic two-phase theory in the bubbling regime of fluidization was developed to model and compare two strategies from different points of view. Comparison between cocurrent and countercurrent modes of operation shows that the reactor in the countercurrent configuration operates with higher conversion of methanol, longer catalyst life, and higher carbon dioxide removal, whereas the reactor in the cocurrent configuration operates with higher carbon monoxide removal, lower water production, and higher hydrogen permeation rate. Enhancement of the carbon dioxide removal in countercurrent mode and the carbon monoxide removal in cocurrent mode causes a lower environmental impact. The lower water production rate in cocurrent mode reduces catalyst recrystallization. DEWEY : 660 ISSN : 0888-5885 En ligne : http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie9005113