Importance of mineralogy in the geoenvironmental characterization and treatment of chromite ore processing residue / Maria Chrysochoou in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 136 N° 3 (Mars 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 136 N° 3 (Mars 2010) . - pp. 510-521 Titre : Importance of mineralogy in the geoenvironmental characterization and treatment of chromite ore processing residue Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Maria Chrysochoou, Auteur ; Dimitris Dermatas, Auteur ; Dennis G. Grubb, Auteur Article en page(s) : pp. 510-521 Note générale : Géotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Chromium Mineralogy Site investigation Expansive soils Hazardous wastes Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : The geoenvironmental characterization of COPR at two deposition sites (New Jersey and Maryland) included geotechnical, chemical, mineralogical, and leaching analyses of three main chromite ore processing residue (COPR) types [gray-black (GB), hard brown (HB), clayey (C)]. Quantitative mineralogical analyses were instrumental in the delineation of the geochemical differences between the three COPR types, which enabled a framework to predict COPR response to potential remediation schemes. Overall, COPR mineralogy resembled cement, with hydration and pozzolanic reactions dominating its geochemistry. GB COPR was largely unreacted despite its prolonged exposure to humid conditions, while HB COPR was completely hydrated and contained high Cr(VI) concentrations. The two materials were chemically similar, with dilution accounting for the chemical and density differences. While the total acid neutralization capacity (ANC) of GB and HB was the same, the ANC at high pH (8–12) was higher in HB due to the dominance of hydrating materials, leading to more buffering capacity and lower Cr(VI) leaching levels. It is concluded that GB and HB were derived from the same ore and process and that postdepositional transformations account for the emergence of HB layers in COPR sites. The physicochemical properties of HB [hardness, high and inaccessible Cr(VI), high ANC] are complicating factors for in situ COPR reductive treatment in the presence of HB. DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.aip.org/vsearch/servlet/VerityServlet?KEY=JGGEFK&smode=strres [...] [article] Importance of mineralogy in the geoenvironmental characterization and treatment of chromite ore processing residue [texte imprimé] / Maria Chrysochoou, Auteur ; Dimitris Dermatas, Auteur ; Dennis G. Grubb, Auteur . - pp. 510-521. Géotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 136 N° 3 (Mars 2010) . - pp. 510-521 Mots-clés : Chromium Mineralogy Site investigation Expansive soils Hazardous wastes Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : The geoenvironmental characterization of COPR at two deposition sites (New Jersey and Maryland) included geotechnical, chemical, mineralogical, and leaching analyses of three main chromite ore processing residue (COPR) types [gray-black (GB), hard brown (HB), clayey (C)]. Quantitative mineralogical analyses were instrumental in the delineation of the geochemical differences between the three COPR types, which enabled a framework to predict COPR response to potential remediation schemes. Overall, COPR mineralogy resembled cement, with hydration and pozzolanic reactions dominating its geochemistry. GB COPR was largely unreacted despite its prolonged exposure to humid conditions, while HB COPR was completely hydrated and contained high Cr(VI) concentrations. The two materials were chemically similar, with dilution accounting for the chemical and density differences. While the total acid neutralization capacity (ANC) of GB and HB was the same, the ANC at high pH (8–12) was higher in HB due to the dominance of hydrating materials, leading to more buffering capacity and lower Cr(VI) leaching levels. It is concluded that GB and HB were derived from the same ore and process and that postdepositional transformations account for the emergence of HB layers in COPR sites. The physicochemical properties of HB [hardness, high and inaccessible Cr(VI), high ANC] are complicating factors for in situ COPR reductive treatment in the presence of HB. DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.aip.org/vsearch/servlet/VerityServlet?KEY=JGGEFK&smode=strres [...]

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire