Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Baris Imamoglu
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheExhumed geogrid-reinforced retaining wall / Leshchinsky, Dov in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 136 N° 10 (Octobre 2010)
[article]
in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 136 N° 10 (Octobre 2010) . - pp. 1311-1323
Titre : Exhumed geogrid-reinforced retaining wall Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Leshchinsky, Dov, Auteur ; Baris Imamoglu, Auteur ; Christopher L. Meehan, Auteur Article en page(s) : pp. 1311-1323 Note générale : Géotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Creep Geogrids Retaining walls Strain gages Stress Reinforcement Reinforced wall Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : An instrumented geogrid-reinforced wall constructed on a highly compressible foundation was deconstructed 16 months after its completion, providing a unique opportunity to exhume and examine the instrumented geogrids that were used to construct the wall. The objectives of this post mortem study were: (1) to inspect the condition of the strain gauges that were attached to the geogrid layers before construction and to verify the reliability of their output; (2) to develop a procedure in which the residual (plastic) strains along exhumed geogrid panels could be determined; and (3) to assess the in situ strain and force distribution along geogrid panels based on the measured residual strains from the exhumed geogrids. After exhumation, it was observed that many of the attached strain gauges failed due to full or partial debonding from the geogrid, thus rendering outputs which potentially underestimated the actual strain. Combining aperture measurements of virgin and exhumed geogrids, all from the same manufacturing lots, enabled the assessment of residual strains following stress relaxation. Laboratory simulation of loading and unloading, including creep and relaxation, yielded a relationship between the measured residual strains and the in situ strain and force distribution; i.e., the residual strain fingerprint provided insight into the behavior of the geogrids within the wall prior to its deconstruction. The mobilized maximum tensile strains in the geogrid panels along the height of the wall were roughly uniform, in the range 4±1%. These findings imply that if the same type of reinforcement had been used throughout the height of the wall, the mobilized force along the height would have been relatively uniform. The back-calculated maximum force in the geogrids indicated that the factor of safety on the long-term strengths of the geogrids ranged from about 1.4 on the stronger/stiffer geogrid to about 1.8 on the weaker/softer geogrid. DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.aip.org/vsearch/servlet/VerityServlet?KEY=JGGEFK&smode=strres [...] [article] Exhumed geogrid-reinforced retaining wall [texte imprimé] / Leshchinsky, Dov, Auteur ; Baris Imamoglu, Auteur ; Christopher L. Meehan, Auteur . - pp. 1311-1323.
Géotechnique
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 136 N° 10 (Octobre 2010) . - pp. 1311-1323
Mots-clés : Creep Geogrids Retaining walls Strain gages Stress Reinforcement Reinforced wall Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : An instrumented geogrid-reinforced wall constructed on a highly compressible foundation was deconstructed 16 months after its completion, providing a unique opportunity to exhume and examine the instrumented geogrids that were used to construct the wall. The objectives of this post mortem study were: (1) to inspect the condition of the strain gauges that were attached to the geogrid layers before construction and to verify the reliability of their output; (2) to develop a procedure in which the residual (plastic) strains along exhumed geogrid panels could be determined; and (3) to assess the in situ strain and force distribution along geogrid panels based on the measured residual strains from the exhumed geogrids. After exhumation, it was observed that many of the attached strain gauges failed due to full or partial debonding from the geogrid, thus rendering outputs which potentially underestimated the actual strain. Combining aperture measurements of virgin and exhumed geogrids, all from the same manufacturing lots, enabled the assessment of residual strains following stress relaxation. Laboratory simulation of loading and unloading, including creep and relaxation, yielded a relationship between the measured residual strains and the in situ strain and force distribution; i.e., the residual strain fingerprint provided insight into the behavior of the geogrids within the wall prior to its deconstruction. The mobilized maximum tensile strains in the geogrid panels along the height of the wall were roughly uniform, in the range 4±1%. These findings imply that if the same type of reinforcement had been used throughout the height of the wall, the mobilized force along the height would have been relatively uniform. The back-calculated maximum force in the geogrids indicated that the factor of safety on the long-term strengths of the geogrids ranged from about 1.4 on the stronger/stiffer geogrid to about 1.8 on the weaker/softer geogrid. DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.aip.org/vsearch/servlet/VerityServlet?KEY=JGGEFK&smode=strres [...]