Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Yang, Xiao
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheBuilding-environment control with wireless sensor and actuator networks / Xianghui, Cao in IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, Vol. 57 N° 11 (Novembre 2010)
[article]
in IEEE transactions on industrial electronics > Vol. 57 N° 11 (Novembre 2010) . - pp. 3596 - 3605
Titre : Building-environment control with wireless sensor and actuator networks : Centralized versus distributed Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Xianghui, Cao, Auteur ; Jiming, Chen, Auteur ; Yang, Xiao, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 3596 - 3605 Note générale : Génie électrique Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Building-environment control Centralized control (CC) Distributed control (DC) Wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs) Index. décimale : 621.38 Dispositifs électroniques. Tubes à électrons. Photocellules. Accélérateurs de particules. Tubes à rayons X Résumé : This paper considers joint problems of control and communication in wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs) for building-environment control systems. In traditional control systems, centralized control (CC) and distributed control (DC) are two major approaches. However, little work has been done in comparing the two approaches in joint problems of control and communication, particularly in WSANs serving as components of control loops. In this paper, we develop a CC scheme in which control decisions are made based on global information and a DC scheme which enables distributed actuators to make control decisions locally. We also develop methods that enable wireless communications among system devices compatible with the control strategies, and propose a method for reducing packet-loss rate. We compare the two schemes using simulations in many aspects. Simulation results show that the DC can achieve a comparable control performance of the CC, while the DC is more robust against packet loss and has lower computational complexity than the CC. Furthermore, the DC has shorter actuation latency than the CC under certain conditions. DEWEY : 621.38 ISSN : 0278-0046 En ligne : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=5210161 [article] Building-environment control with wireless sensor and actuator networks : Centralized versus distributed [texte imprimé] / Xianghui, Cao, Auteur ; Jiming, Chen, Auteur ; Yang, Xiao, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 3596 - 3605.
Génie électrique
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in IEEE transactions on industrial electronics > Vol. 57 N° 11 (Novembre 2010) . - pp. 3596 - 3605
Mots-clés : Building-environment control Centralized control (CC) Distributed control (DC) Wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs) Index. décimale : 621.38 Dispositifs électroniques. Tubes à électrons. Photocellules. Accélérateurs de particules. Tubes à rayons X Résumé : This paper considers joint problems of control and communication in wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs) for building-environment control systems. In traditional control systems, centralized control (CC) and distributed control (DC) are two major approaches. However, little work has been done in comparing the two approaches in joint problems of control and communication, particularly in WSANs serving as components of control loops. In this paper, we develop a CC scheme in which control decisions are made based on global information and a DC scheme which enables distributed actuators to make control decisions locally. We also develop methods that enable wireless communications among system devices compatible with the control strategies, and propose a method for reducing packet-loss rate. We compare the two schemes using simulations in many aspects. Simulation results show that the DC can achieve a comparable control performance of the CC, while the DC is more robust against packet loss and has lower computational complexity than the CC. Furthermore, the DC has shorter actuation latency than the CC under certain conditions. DEWEY : 621.38 ISSN : 0278-0046 En ligne : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=5210161