Evaluation of turbulence models using direct numerical and large-eddy simulation data / Raiesi, Hassan in Transactions of the ASME . Journal of fluids engineering, Vol. 133 N° 2 (Fevrier 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inTransactions of the ASME . Journal of fluids engineering > Vol. 133 N° 2 (Fevrier 2011) . - 10 p. Titre : Evaluation of turbulence models using direct numerical and large-eddy simulation data Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Raiesi, Hassan, Auteur ; Piomelli, Ugo, Auteur ; Pollard, Andrew, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : 10 p. Note générale : Fluids engineering Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Boundary layers Flow separation simulation Pipe flow Turbulence Index. décimale : 620.1 Essais des matériaux. Défauts des matériaux. Protection des matériaux Résumé : The performance of some commonly used eddy-viscosity turbulence models has been evaluated using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) data. Two configurations have been tested, a two-dimensional boundary layer undergoing pressure-driven separation, and a square duct. The DNS and LES were used to assess the k−epsilon, zeta−f, k−omega, and Spalart–Allmaras models. For the two-dimensional separated boundary layer, anisotropic effects are not significant and the eddy-viscosity assumption works well. However, the near-wall treatment used in k−epsilon models was found to have a critical effect on the predictive accuracy of the model (and, in particular, of separation and reattachment points). None of the wall treatments tested resulted in accurate prediction of the flow field. Better results were obtained with models that do not require special treatment in the inner layer (zeta−f, k−omega, and Spalart–Allmaras models). For the square duct calculation, only a nonlinear constitutive relation was found to be able to capture the secondary flow, giving results in agreement with the data. Linear models had significant error. DEWEY : 620.1 ISSN : 0098-2202 En ligne : http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JFEGA400013 [...] [article] Evaluation of turbulence models using direct numerical and large-eddy simulation data [texte imprimé] / Raiesi, Hassan, Auteur ; Piomelli, Ugo, Auteur ; Pollard, Andrew, Auteur . - 2011 . - 10 p. Fluids engineering Langues : Anglais (eng) in Transactions of the ASME . Journal of fluids engineering > Vol. 133 N° 2 (Fevrier 2011) . - 10 p. Mots-clés : Boundary layers Flow separation simulation Pipe flow Turbulence Index. décimale : 620.1 Essais des matériaux. Défauts des matériaux. Protection des matériaux Résumé : The performance of some commonly used eddy-viscosity turbulence models has been evaluated using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) data. Two configurations have been tested, a two-dimensional boundary layer undergoing pressure-driven separation, and a square duct. The DNS and LES were used to assess the k−epsilon, zeta−f, k−omega, and Spalart–Allmaras models. For the two-dimensional separated boundary layer, anisotropic effects are not significant and the eddy-viscosity assumption works well. However, the near-wall treatment used in k−epsilon models was found to have a critical effect on the predictive accuracy of the model (and, in particular, of separation and reattachment points). None of the wall treatments tested resulted in accurate prediction of the flow field. Better results were obtained with models that do not require special treatment in the inner layer (zeta−f, k−omega, and Spalart–Allmaras models). For the square duct calculation, only a nonlinear constitutive relation was found to be able to capture the secondary flow, giving results in agreement with the data. Linear models had significant error. DEWEY : 620.1 ISSN : 0098-2202 En ligne : http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JFEGA400013 [...]

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire