Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur

A negotiated solution for the Jordan basin / Atwi, M. in Journal of the operational research society (JORS), Vol. 62 N° 1 (Janvier 2011) 

Public ISBD [article]  in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 1 (Janvier 2011) . - pp. 81–91 Titre : A negotiated solution for the Jordan basin Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Atwi, M., Auteur ; Chóliz, J. S., Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 81–91 Note générale : Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Jordan  basin  Water  allocation  Water  conflict  Negotiation  game Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : The use of water in the Jordan Basin has been a key factor in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, and among Israel and its neighbours. In this paper, we explore possible ways of sharing water through a negotiation game with two players—Arabs and Israelis. We estimate a set of optimum Pareto allocations, as well as identifying a range of negotiated solutions. Our results suggest that viable solutions would improve incomes by some 20% compared to the current status quo. These solutions are close to the long-standing proposal contained in the Johnston Plan. Meanwhile, theoretical fairness criteria, which are more favourable to the Arabs than the Johnston Plan, maybe are not actually better in technical terms and could in any case only be achieved if the Arabs’ negotiating position were much stronger than the Israelis’. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n1/abs/jors2009162a.html [article] A negotiated solution for the Jordan basin [texte imprimé] / Atwi, M., Auteur ; Chóliz, J. S., Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 81–91. Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 1 (Janvier 2011) . - pp. 81–91 Mots-clés : Jordan  basin  Water  allocation  Water  conflict  Negotiation  game Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : The use of water in the Jordan Basin has been a key factor in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, and among Israel and its neighbours. In this paper, we explore possible ways of sharing water through a negotiation game with two players—Arabs and Israelis. We estimate a set of optimum Pareto allocations, as well as identifying a range of negotiated solutions. Our results suggest that viable solutions would improve incomes by some 20% compared to the current status quo. These solutions are close to the long-standing proposal contained in the Johnston Plan. Meanwhile, theoretical fairness criteria, which are more favourable to the Arabs than the Johnston Plan, maybe are not actually better in technical terms and could in any case only be achieved if the Arabs’ negotiating position were much stronger than the Israelis’. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n1/abs/jors2009162a.html