Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur

Does AHP help us make a choice? / Ishizaka, A. in Journal of the operational research society (JORS), Vol. 62 N° 10 (Octobre 2011) 

Public ISBD [article]  in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 10 (Octobre 2011) . - pp. 1801–1812 Titre : Does AHP help us make a choice? : an experimental evaluation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Ishizaka, A., Auteur ; Balkenborg, D., Auteur ; Kaplan, T., Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 1801–1812 Note générale : Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Decision  analysis  Multiple  criteria  decision  aid  Analytic  hierarchy  process  (AHP)  Validation  Experimental  economics Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : In this paper, we use experimental economics methods to test how well Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) fares as a choice support system in a real decision problem. AHP provides a ranking that we statistically compare with three additional rankings given by the subjects in the experiment: one at the beginning, one after providing AHP with the necessary pair-wise comparisons and one after learning the ranking provided by AHP. While the rankings vary widely across subjects, we observe that for each individual all four rankings are similar. Hence, subjects are consistent and AHP is, for the most part, able to replicate their rankings. Furthermore, while the rankings are similar, we do find that the AHP ranking helps the decision makers reformulate their choices by taking into account suggestions made by AHP. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n10/abs/jors2010158a.html [article] Does AHP help us make a choice? : an experimental evaluation [texte imprimé] / Ishizaka, A., Auteur ; Balkenborg, D., Auteur ; Kaplan, T., Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 1801–1812. Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 10 (Octobre 2011) . - pp. 1801–1812 Mots-clés : Decision  analysis  Multiple  criteria  decision  aid  Analytic  hierarchy  process  (AHP)  Validation  Experimental  economics Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : In this paper, we use experimental economics methods to test how well Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) fares as a choice support system in a real decision problem. AHP provides a ranking that we statistically compare with three additional rankings given by the subjects in the experiment: one at the beginning, one after providing AHP with the necessary pair-wise comparisons and one after learning the ranking provided by AHP. While the rankings vary widely across subjects, we observe that for each individual all four rankings are similar. Hence, subjects are consistent and AHP is, for the most part, able to replicate their rankings. Furthermore, while the rankings are similar, we do find that the AHP ranking helps the decision makers reformulate their choices by taking into account suggestions made by AHP. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n10/abs/jors2010158a.html

Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP / Ishizaka, A. in Journal of the operational research society (JORS), Vol. 62 N° 4 (Avril 2011) 

Public ISBD [article]  in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 4 (Avril 2011) . - pp. 700–710 Titre : Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Ishizaka, A., Auteur ; Balkenborg, D., Auteur ; Kaplan, T., Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 700–710 Note générale : Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Decision  analysis  Multiple  criteria  analysis  Utility  theory  Additive  AHP  Multiplicative  AHP  Logarithmic  scale Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most popular multi-attribute decision aid methods. However, within AHP, there are several competing preference measurement scales and aggregation techniques. In this paper, we compare these possibilities using a decision problem with an inherent trade-off between two criteria. A decision-maker has to choose among three alternatives: two extremes and one compromise. Six different measurement scales described previously in the literature and the new proposed logarithmic scale are considered for applying the additive and the multiplicative aggregation techniques. The results are compared with the standard consumer choice theory. We find that with the geometric and power scales a compromise is never selected when aggregation is additive and rarely when aggregation is multiplicative, while the logarithmic scale used with the multiplicative aggregation most often selects the compromise that is desirable by consumer choice theory. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n4/abs/jors201023a.html [article] Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP [texte imprimé] / Ishizaka, A., Auteur ; Balkenborg, D., Auteur ; Kaplan, T., Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 700–710. Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 4 (Avril 2011) . - pp. 700–710 Mots-clés : Decision  analysis  Multiple  criteria  analysis  Utility  theory  Additive  AHP  Multiplicative  AHP  Logarithmic  scale Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most popular multi-attribute decision aid methods. However, within AHP, there are several competing preference measurement scales and aggregation techniques. In this paper, we compare these possibilities using a decision problem with an inherent trade-off between two criteria. A decision-maker has to choose among three alternatives: two extremes and one compromise. Six different measurement scales described previously in the literature and the new proposed logarithmic scale are considered for applying the additive and the multiplicative aggregation techniques. The results are compared with the standard consumer choice theory. We find that with the geometric and power scales a compromise is never selected when aggregation is additive and rarely when aggregation is multiplicative, while the logarithmic scale used with the multiplicative aggregation most often selects the compromise that is desirable by consumer choice theory. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n4/abs/jors201023a.html