After paradim: why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again / Zhu, Z. in Journal of the operational research society (JORS), Vol. 62 N° 4 (Avril 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 4 (Avril 2011) . - pp. 784–798 Titre : After paradim: why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Zhu, Z., Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 784–798 Note générale : Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Methodology Paradigm Ontological flexibility Pragmatism Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : Combining multiple methodologies works in practice, but not yet in theory. One of the reasons is that current theorising is dominated by a paradigm mentality, preoccupied with wholesale philosophical legitimation. ‘Paradigm’ and the associated ‘incommensurability’ were once revolutionary heuristic tools; now they are mistaken for the basis of an essentialist foundation. The result is a stifling of intellectual innovation and a diminishing of practical relevance. For OR research to make a positive difference again, it is time to move beyond paradigm-based theorising. After paradigm, there are many opportunities. This paper explores a pragmatist alternative that is action-oriented, multiplicity-embracing, ethically concerned and politically sensitive. Incorporating ontological flexibility, it allows OR workers to enact multiple realities, craft ontology-in-use, weave available methods with situated particulars, justify methodologies based on practical consequences, so as to get jobs done and enhance competences. Promoting ontological flexibility and methodology-in-use is a useful starting point for after-paradigm theorising that supports innovative mixing-methodology practice. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n4/abs/jors201031a.html [article] After paradim: why mixing-methodology theorising fails and how to make it work again [texte imprimé] / Zhu, Z., Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 784–798. Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 62 N° 4 (Avril 2011) . - pp. 784–798 Mots-clés : Methodology Paradigm Ontological flexibility Pragmatism Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : Combining multiple methodologies works in practice, but not yet in theory. One of the reasons is that current theorising is dominated by a paradigm mentality, preoccupied with wholesale philosophical legitimation. ‘Paradigm’ and the associated ‘incommensurability’ were once revolutionary heuristic tools; now they are mistaken for the basis of an essentialist foundation. The result is a stifling of intellectual innovation and a diminishing of practical relevance. For OR research to make a positive difference again, it is time to move beyond paradigm-based theorising. After paradigm, there are many opportunities. This paper explores a pragmatist alternative that is action-oriented, multiplicity-embracing, ethically concerned and politically sensitive. Incorporating ontological flexibility, it allows OR workers to enact multiple realities, craft ontology-in-use, weave available methods with situated particulars, justify methodologies based on practical consequences, so as to get jobs done and enhance competences. Promoting ontological flexibility and methodology-in-use is a useful starting point for after-paradigm theorising that supports innovative mixing-methodology practice. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0160-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v62/n4/abs/jors201031a.html

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire