Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur

Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information / Basak Kalkanci in Management science, Vol. 57 N° 4 (Avril 2011) 

Public ISBD [article]  in Management science > Vol. 57 N° 4 (Avril 2011) . - pp. 689-704 Titre : Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information : An experimental evaluation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Basak Kalkanci, Auteur ; Kay-Yut Chen, Auteur ; Feryal Erhun, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 689-704 Note générale : Management Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Behavioral  operations  management  All-unit  quantity  discount  contracts  Price-only  contracts  Complex  contracts  Contract  performance  Supply  chain  efficiency  Asymmetric  demand  information  Experience-weighted  attraction  learning  model Index. décimale : 658 Organisation des entreprises. Techniques du commerce Résumé : Exploring the tension between theory and practice regarding complexity and performance in contract design is especially relevant. The goal of this paper is to understand why simpler contracts may commonly be preferred in practice despite being theoretically suboptimal. We study a two-tier supply chain with a single supplier and a single buyer to characterize the impact of contract complexity and asymmetric information on performance and to compare theoretical predictions to actual behavior in human subject experiments. In the experiments, the computerized buyer faces a newsvendor setting and has better information on end-consumer demand than the human supplier. The supplier offers either a quantity discount contract (with two or three price blocks) or a price-only contract, contracts that are commonplace in practice, yet different in complexity. Results show that, contrary to theoretical predictions, quantity discounts do not necessarily increase the supplier's profits. We also observe a more equitable distribution of profits between the supplier and the buyer than what theory predicts. These observations can be described with three decision biases (the probabilistic choice bias, the reinforcement bias, and the memory bias) and can be modeled using the experience-weighted attraction learning model. Our results demonstrate that simpler contracts, such as a price-only contract or a quantity discount contract with a low number of price blocks, are sufficient for a supplier designing contracts under asymmetric demand information. DEWEY : 658 ISSN : 0025-1909 En ligne : http://mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/57/4/689 [article] Contract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information : An experimental evaluation [texte imprimé] / Basak Kalkanci, Auteur ; Kay-Yut Chen, Auteur ; Feryal Erhun, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 689-704. Management Langues : Anglais (eng) in Management science > Vol. 57 N° 4 (Avril 2011) . - pp. 689-704 Mots-clés : Behavioral  operations  management  All-unit  quantity  discount  contracts  Price-only  contracts  Complex  contracts  Contract  performance  Supply  chain  efficiency  Asymmetric  demand  information  Experience-weighted  attraction  learning  model Index. décimale : 658 Organisation des entreprises. Techniques du commerce Résumé : Exploring the tension between theory and practice regarding complexity and performance in contract design is especially relevant. The goal of this paper is to understand why simpler contracts may commonly be preferred in practice despite being theoretically suboptimal. We study a two-tier supply chain with a single supplier and a single buyer to characterize the impact of contract complexity and asymmetric information on performance and to compare theoretical predictions to actual behavior in human subject experiments. In the experiments, the computerized buyer faces a newsvendor setting and has better information on end-consumer demand than the human supplier. The supplier offers either a quantity discount contract (with two or three price blocks) or a price-only contract, contracts that are commonplace in practice, yet different in complexity. Results show that, contrary to theoretical predictions, quantity discounts do not necessarily increase the supplier's profits. We also observe a more equitable distribution of profits between the supplier and the buyer than what theory predicts. These observations can be described with three decision biases (the probabilistic choice bias, the reinforcement bias, and the memory bias) and can be modeled using the experience-weighted attraction learning model. Our results demonstrate that simpler contracts, such as a price-only contract or a quantity discount contract with a low number of price blocks, are sufficient for a supplier designing contracts under asymmetric demand information. DEWEY : 658 ISSN : 0025-1909 En ligne : http://mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/57/4/689