[article]
Titre : |
In-plane experimental testing of timber-concrete composite floor diaphragms |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Michael P. Newcombe, Auteur ; Wouter A. Van Beerschoten, Auteur ; David Carradine, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2011 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 1461-1468 |
Note générale : |
Génie Civil |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Multistory Timber Floor diaphragm Timber-concrete composite |
Index. décimale : |
624 Constructions du génie civil et du bâtiment. Infrastructures. Ouvrages en terres. Fondations. Tunnels. Ponts et charpentes |
Résumé : |
Recent advances in multistory timber building design have led to new structural systems that allow open floor plans with large spans between frames and/or walls. Timber-concrete composite (TCC) flooring can achieve the spans required but has the potential to be flexible under diaphragm actions, which can significantly alter the seismic response of a building. In-plane experimental tests on a 3 m by 3 m one-third scale TCC floor were performed using quasi-static earthquake loading simulation. The experimental results indicate that the deformation between the floor and lateral load resisting systems (LLRS) is much greater than the in-plane deformation of the floor diaphragm. Hence, a floor system with similar aspect ratio can be modeled as a single-degree-of-freedom for future structural analyses. Different connections were considered between the floor unit and lateral restraints, which simulate the LLRS. The connection was either timber-to-timber or concrete-to-timber and incorporated screws or nails acting as dowels or inclined at 45°. Each connection type performed differently in terms of stiffness, strength, ductility capacity, and induced damage. Screws that were oriented at 45° to the connection interface were significantly stiffer than fasteners aligned orthogonal to the interface. There was little difference in the initial stiffness for the concrete-to-timber connection compared to the timber-to-timber connection. The testing indicated that a timber-to-timber interface is more desirable because of construction ease and reparability. The in-plane response of the floor system is modeled using finite elements and compared to experimental results. Design recommendations are provided for the cyclic strength of inclined wood fasteners.
|
DEWEY : |
624.17 |
ISSN : |
0733-9445 |
En ligne : |
http://ascelibrary.org/sto/resource/1/jsendh/v136/i11/p1461_s1?isAuthorized=no |
in Journal of structural engineering > Vol. 136 N° 11 (Novembre 2010) . - pp. 1461-1468
[article] In-plane experimental testing of timber-concrete composite floor diaphragms [texte imprimé] / Michael P. Newcombe, Auteur ; Wouter A. Van Beerschoten, Auteur ; David Carradine, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 1461-1468. Génie Civil Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of structural engineering > Vol. 136 N° 11 (Novembre 2010) . - pp. 1461-1468
Mots-clés : |
Multistory Timber Floor diaphragm Timber-concrete composite |
Index. décimale : |
624 Constructions du génie civil et du bâtiment. Infrastructures. Ouvrages en terres. Fondations. Tunnels. Ponts et charpentes |
Résumé : |
Recent advances in multistory timber building design have led to new structural systems that allow open floor plans with large spans between frames and/or walls. Timber-concrete composite (TCC) flooring can achieve the spans required but has the potential to be flexible under diaphragm actions, which can significantly alter the seismic response of a building. In-plane experimental tests on a 3 m by 3 m one-third scale TCC floor were performed using quasi-static earthquake loading simulation. The experimental results indicate that the deformation between the floor and lateral load resisting systems (LLRS) is much greater than the in-plane deformation of the floor diaphragm. Hence, a floor system with similar aspect ratio can be modeled as a single-degree-of-freedom for future structural analyses. Different connections were considered between the floor unit and lateral restraints, which simulate the LLRS. The connection was either timber-to-timber or concrete-to-timber and incorporated screws or nails acting as dowels or inclined at 45°. Each connection type performed differently in terms of stiffness, strength, ductility capacity, and induced damage. Screws that were oriented at 45° to the connection interface were significantly stiffer than fasteners aligned orthogonal to the interface. There was little difference in the initial stiffness for the concrete-to-timber connection compared to the timber-to-timber connection. The testing indicated that a timber-to-timber interface is more desirable because of construction ease and reparability. The in-plane response of the floor system is modeled using finite elements and compared to experimental results. Design recommendations are provided for the cyclic strength of inclined wood fasteners.
|
DEWEY : |
624.17 |
ISSN : |
0733-9445 |
En ligne : |
http://ascelibrary.org/sto/resource/1/jsendh/v136/i11/p1461_s1?isAuthorized=no |
|