Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur

Application of AHP and ANP in supplier selection process-a case in an automotive company / M. Navid Kasirian in International journal of management science and engineering management, Vol. 5 N° 2 (Avril 2010) 

Public ISBD [article]  in International journal of management science and engineering management > Vol. 5 N° 2 (Avril 2010) . - pp.125-135 Titre : Application of AHP and ANP in supplier selection process-a case in an automotive company Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : M. Navid Kasirian, Auteur ; Rosnah Mohd. Yusuff, Auteur ; M. Y Ismail, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp.125-135 Note générale : Management Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Supplier  selection  Interdependencies  Decision  makers  Analytic  hierarchy  process  Analytic  network  process  Preemptive  goal  programming Résumé : Most organizations prefer to outsource the activities which are not cost-efficient. With regard to the huge amount of expenditure in this area, proper selection of the desirable suppliers becomes significant. Previous studies indicated that the criteria of supplier selection might not be always independent, and this fact implies the existence of interdependencies among them that may affect the supplier selection. This study presents and compares two multi-attribute decision making (MADM) techniques to deal with the supplier selection problem with and without interdependency. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and its extension, Analytic Network Process (ANP) are applied to find the final priorities of the suppliers respectively for the cases of independency and interdependency in an automotive manufacturing company. The two techniques lead to different rankings for the potential suppliers. Thus, a Preemptive Goal Programming (PGP) with two goals, maximizing the Total Value of Purchasing and minimizing the Total Cost of Purchasing, to decide which method is the best was conducted. The whole process is illustrated in a case study. The results from the company of the case study showed that the ANP had the optimal TCP of 1,290 US dollars, while the value for AHP was 1,710 USD. However, comparing the TVP value for the two methods shows a negligible difference. DEWEY : 658 ISSN : 1750-9653 En ligne : http://www.ijmsem.org/OnlineJournal.do/?125.html [article] Application of AHP and ANP in supplier selection process-a case in an automotive company [texte imprimé] / M. Navid Kasirian, Auteur ; Rosnah Mohd. Yusuff, Auteur ; M. Y Ismail, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp.125-135. Management Langues : Anglais (eng) in International journal of management science and engineering management > Vol. 5 N° 2 (Avril 2010) . - pp.125-135 Mots-clés : Supplier  selection  Interdependencies  Decision  makers  Analytic  hierarchy  process  Analytic  network  process  Preemptive  goal  programming Résumé : Most organizations prefer to outsource the activities which are not cost-efficient. With regard to the huge amount of expenditure in this area, proper selection of the desirable suppliers becomes significant. Previous studies indicated that the criteria of supplier selection might not be always independent, and this fact implies the existence of interdependencies among them that may affect the supplier selection. This study presents and compares two multi-attribute decision making (MADM) techniques to deal with the supplier selection problem with and without interdependency. An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and its extension, Analytic Network Process (ANP) are applied to find the final priorities of the suppliers respectively for the cases of independency and interdependency in an automotive manufacturing company. The two techniques lead to different rankings for the potential suppliers. Thus, a Preemptive Goal Programming (PGP) with two goals, maximizing the Total Value of Purchasing and minimizing the Total Cost of Purchasing, to decide which method is the best was conducted. The whole process is illustrated in a case study. The results from the company of the case study showed that the ANP had the optimal TCP of 1,290 US dollars, while the value for AHP was 1,710 USD. However, comparing the TVP value for the two methods shows a negligible difference. DEWEY : 658 ISSN : 1750-9653 En ligne : http://www.ijmsem.org/OnlineJournal.do/?125.html