Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur J. C. Chou
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheCentrifuge modeling of seismically induced uplitt for the BART transbay tube / J. C. Chou in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 137 N° 8 (Août 2011)
[article]
in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 137 N° 8 (Août 2011) . - pp. 754-765
Titre : Centrifuge modeling of seismically induced uplitt for the BART transbay tube Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : J. C. Chou, Auteur ; B. L. Kutter, Auteur ; T. Travasarou, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 754-765 Note générale : Géotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Tunnel Centrifuge modeling Liquefication Buried structure Sand Gravel Clay Earthquake Uplift mechanisms Seismic performance Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : The BART Transbay Tube (TBT) is an immersed cut-and-cover subway tunnel that runs from Oakland to San Francisco, California. The loose sand and gravel backfills placed around the tunnel are considered to be liquefiable, and the clays under the backfill are soft in some zones along the alignment. These conditions could potentially result in uplift of the tunnel during strong earthquake shaking. This paper describes centrifuge model tests performed to verify numerical methods used to assess the stability and to evaluate the potential uplift mechanisms of the TBT. The observed mechanisms of uplift were a ratcheting mechanism (sand migrating under the tunnel with each cycle of relative movement), a pore water migration mechanism (water flowing under the tunnel), and a bottom heave mechanism, involving soft soils below the base of the trench. A fourth potential mechanism, viscous flow of liquefied soil, was not observed. The volume of the tunnel relative to the volume of the trench and the densities and permeabilities of the nonhomogeneous backfill were important parameters affecting the uplift of the tunnel. From the experiments reported here and analyses reported by the designers, it was concluded that the magnitude of uplift is limited and, hence, that an expensive ground improvement project to densify the backfill was unwarranted.
DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/gto/resource/1/jggefk/v137/i8/p754_s1?isAuthorized=no [article] Centrifuge modeling of seismically induced uplitt for the BART transbay tube [texte imprimé] / J. C. Chou, Auteur ; B. L. Kutter, Auteur ; T. Travasarou, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 754-765.
Géotechnique
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 137 N° 8 (Août 2011) . - pp. 754-765
Mots-clés : Tunnel Centrifuge modeling Liquefication Buried structure Sand Gravel Clay Earthquake Uplift mechanisms Seismic performance Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : The BART Transbay Tube (TBT) is an immersed cut-and-cover subway tunnel that runs from Oakland to San Francisco, California. The loose sand and gravel backfills placed around the tunnel are considered to be liquefiable, and the clays under the backfill are soft in some zones along the alignment. These conditions could potentially result in uplift of the tunnel during strong earthquake shaking. This paper describes centrifuge model tests performed to verify numerical methods used to assess the stability and to evaluate the potential uplift mechanisms of the TBT. The observed mechanisms of uplift were a ratcheting mechanism (sand migrating under the tunnel with each cycle of relative movement), a pore water migration mechanism (water flowing under the tunnel), and a bottom heave mechanism, involving soft soils below the base of the trench. A fourth potential mechanism, viscous flow of liquefied soil, was not observed. The volume of the tunnel relative to the volume of the trench and the densities and permeabilities of the nonhomogeneous backfill were important parameters affecting the uplift of the tunnel. From the experiments reported here and analyses reported by the designers, it was concluded that the magnitude of uplift is limited and, hence, that an expensive ground improvement project to densify the backfill was unwarranted.
DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/gto/resource/1/jggefk/v137/i8/p754_s1?isAuthorized=no