Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Thomas J. Weaver
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheReduction factor for the unloading point method at clay soil sites / Thomas J. Weaver in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 136 N° 4 (Avril 2010)
[article]
in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 136 N° 4 (Avril 2010) . - pp. 643-646
Titre : Reduction factor for the unloading point method at clay soil sites Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Thomas J. Weaver, Auteur ; Kyle M. Rollins, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : pp. 643-646 Note générale : Géotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Rapid Load Test Pile Foundation Statnamic Fundex Unloading point method Clay Rate effects Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : Full-scale testing can be an integral component of quality control/quality assurance for projects involving construction of deep foundations. Rapid load tests are being used in the deep foundation industry as a method for assessing the axial static behavior of deep foundations. Since rapid load tests involve dynamics, inertial and damping forces must be considered in analyzing measured pile response to estimate the static pile response. The unloading point method (UPM) is typically used for this purpose. Generally considered a consequence of load rate effects in clays, results from the UPM must be further modified by a reduction factor to obtain a reasonable estimate of the static pile response. A reduction factor of 0.65 applied to the UPM for clay soil sites has been recommended by others. However, a review and analysis of readily available literature reporting static and rapid pile load test results at sites predominantly consisting of clay soils indicate that an average reduction factor of 0.47 is more appropriate. Rapid load testing should be used judiciously. When using the UPM to estimate static pile capacity from rapid load tests in clay, static load tests should be performed to validate the reduction factor used to interpret rapid load tests.
DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/gto/resource/1/jggefk/v136/i4/p643_s1?isAuthorized=no [article] Reduction factor for the unloading point method at clay soil sites [texte imprimé] / Thomas J. Weaver, Auteur ; Kyle M. Rollins, Auteur . - 2010 . - pp. 643-646.
Géotechnique
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 136 N° 4 (Avril 2010) . - pp. 643-646
Mots-clés : Rapid Load Test Pile Foundation Statnamic Fundex Unloading point method Clay Rate effects Index. décimale : 624.1 Infrastructures.Ouvrages en terre. Fondations. Tunnels Résumé : Full-scale testing can be an integral component of quality control/quality assurance for projects involving construction of deep foundations. Rapid load tests are being used in the deep foundation industry as a method for assessing the axial static behavior of deep foundations. Since rapid load tests involve dynamics, inertial and damping forces must be considered in analyzing measured pile response to estimate the static pile response. The unloading point method (UPM) is typically used for this purpose. Generally considered a consequence of load rate effects in clays, results from the UPM must be further modified by a reduction factor to obtain a reasonable estimate of the static pile response. A reduction factor of 0.65 applied to the UPM for clay soil sites has been recommended by others. However, a review and analysis of readily available literature reporting static and rapid pile load test results at sites predominantly consisting of clay soils indicate that an average reduction factor of 0.47 is more appropriate. Rapid load testing should be used judiciously. When using the UPM to estimate static pile capacity from rapid load tests in clay, static load tests should be performed to validate the reduction factor used to interpret rapid load tests.
DEWEY : 624.1 ISSN : 1090-0241 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/gto/resource/1/jggefk/v136/i4/p643_s1?isAuthorized=no