Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur John J. Birtill
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheSystematic procedures for interpretation and modeling of catalyst deactivation using integral fixed-bed reactors / John J. Birtill in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, Vol. 50 N° 6 (Mars 2011)
[article]
in Industrial & engineering chemistry research > Vol. 50 N° 6 (Mars 2011) . - pp. 3145–3158
Titre : Systematic procedures for interpretation and modeling of catalyst deactivation using integral fixed-bed reactors Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : John J. Birtill, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 3145–3158 Note générale : Chimie industrielle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Catalyst Composition fluid phase Résumé : The method of decreasing conversion, constant space−time (DCCST) is sometimes used for empirical determination of catalyst decay kinetics in fixed beds. The method of constant conversion, increasing space−time (CCIST) is used infrequently. Although it is well known that these methods are most readily applied to cases in which the deactivation is independent of the composition of the fluid phase, the ease with which they can be misapplied to concentration-dependent cases has not been studied systematically. In this work, the empirical determination of catalyst decay kinetics in fixed beds has been examined by numerical simulation. It has been shown that it is rather easy to generate an invalid concentration-independent decay model, either by fitting a dubious straight line to a limited range of data using the DCCST method or by fitting a good, or even perfect, straight line using the CCIST method. It has also been shown that both methods can, in principle, be used reliably for empirical determination of catalyst decay kinetics, whatever the dependence on composition, provided that multiple experiments are carried out over a range of conversion. The CCIST method has much greater potential for resolving reaction and decay kinetics than has been realized previously, and it can be applied to reversible as well as irreversible reactions. This method will generally give a linear plot, provided that the selected plot corresponds to the actual decay order. The plot is exactly linear for any first-order decay kinetics and almost linear for non-first-order decay kinetics. Exact analytical solutions have been derived for various first-order cases. These solutions can be used to determine the true decay kinetics from multiple parallel experiments. Deviation from ideal behavior in this method is a useful indication that the power-law decay kinetics has a limited range of validity, beyond which a more detailed, systematic investigation may be required. DEWEY : 660 ISSN : 0888-5885 En ligne : http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie101481y [article] Systematic procedures for interpretation and modeling of catalyst deactivation using integral fixed-bed reactors [texte imprimé] / John J. Birtill, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 3145–3158.
Chimie industrielle
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Industrial & engineering chemistry research > Vol. 50 N° 6 (Mars 2011) . - pp. 3145–3158
Mots-clés : Catalyst Composition fluid phase Résumé : The method of decreasing conversion, constant space−time (DCCST) is sometimes used for empirical determination of catalyst decay kinetics in fixed beds. The method of constant conversion, increasing space−time (CCIST) is used infrequently. Although it is well known that these methods are most readily applied to cases in which the deactivation is independent of the composition of the fluid phase, the ease with which they can be misapplied to concentration-dependent cases has not been studied systematically. In this work, the empirical determination of catalyst decay kinetics in fixed beds has been examined by numerical simulation. It has been shown that it is rather easy to generate an invalid concentration-independent decay model, either by fitting a dubious straight line to a limited range of data using the DCCST method or by fitting a good, or even perfect, straight line using the CCIST method. It has also been shown that both methods can, in principle, be used reliably for empirical determination of catalyst decay kinetics, whatever the dependence on composition, provided that multiple experiments are carried out over a range of conversion. The CCIST method has much greater potential for resolving reaction and decay kinetics than has been realized previously, and it can be applied to reversible as well as irreversible reactions. This method will generally give a linear plot, provided that the selected plot corresponds to the actual decay order. The plot is exactly linear for any first-order decay kinetics and almost linear for non-first-order decay kinetics. Exact analytical solutions have been derived for various first-order cases. These solutions can be used to determine the true decay kinetics from multiple parallel experiments. Deviation from ideal behavior in this method is a useful indication that the power-law decay kinetics has a limited range of validity, beyond which a more detailed, systematic investigation may be required. DEWEY : 660 ISSN : 0888-5885 En ligne : http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ie101481y