Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests / G-T. Yeo in Journal of the operational research society (JORS), Vol. 61 N° 8 (Août 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 61 N° 8 (Août 2010) . - pp. 1249–1257 Titre : Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : G-T. Yeo, Auteur ; D-W. Song, Auteur ; J. Dinwoodie, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 1249–1257 Note générale : Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Container port competitiveness Multiple decision-making group problems Combined AHP procedure Compromise weights Dempster-Shafer theory Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : Generally, an evaluation of container port competitiveness is regarded as a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem which involves various stakeholders with conflicting interests. To solve MCDM problems, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method has been popular, but problems arise in managing uncertainty among decision makers, and contradictory opinions. The key issue discussed in this paper is how to obtain compromise weights (CWs) using a combined AHP procedure. This procedure incorporates Dempster-Shafer theory for eliminating uncertainty in the evaluation, and a levelling process for adjusting the contradictory opinions of each group, a so-called multiple decision-making group problem. For an empirical analysis, container ports located in Northeast Asia, known to exhibit severe port competition, were selected. Using an adoption of the methodology, the matrix of CWs was obtained. Using this matrix permits an exact evaluation of competitiveness in the sampled container ports. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0361-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v61/n8/abs/jors200988a.html [article] Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests [texte imprimé] / G-T. Yeo, Auteur ; D-W. Song, Auteur ; J. Dinwoodie, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 1249–1257. Recherche opérationnelle Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of the operational research society (JORS) > Vol. 61 N° 8 (Août 2010) . - pp. 1249–1257 Mots-clés : Container port competitiveness Multiple decision-making group problems Combined AHP procedure Compromise weights Dempster-Shafer theory Index. décimale : 001.424 Résumé : Generally, an evaluation of container port competitiveness is regarded as a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem which involves various stakeholders with conflicting interests. To solve MCDM problems, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method has been popular, but problems arise in managing uncertainty among decision makers, and contradictory opinions. The key issue discussed in this paper is how to obtain compromise weights (CWs) using a combined AHP procedure. This procedure incorporates Dempster-Shafer theory for eliminating uncertainty in the evaluation, and a levelling process for adjusting the contradictory opinions of each group, a so-called multiple decision-making group problem. For an empirical analysis, container ports located in Northeast Asia, known to exhibit severe port competition, were selected. Using an adoption of the methodology, the matrix of CWs was obtained. Using this matrix permits an exact evaluation of competitiveness in the sampled container ports. DEWEY : 001.424 ISSN : 0361-5682 En ligne : http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v61/n8/abs/jors200988a.html

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire