Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur J. Leiva
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheEstimation of the actual bubble surface area flux in flotation / J. Leiva in Minerals engineering, Vol. 23 N° 11-13 (Octobre 2010)
[article]
in Minerals engineering > Vol. 23 N° 11-13 (Octobre 2010) . - pp. 888–894
Titre : Estimation of the actual bubble surface area flux in flotation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : J. Leiva, Auteur ; L. Vinnett, Auteur ; F. Contreras, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 888–894 Note générale : Génie Minier Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Froth flotation Flotation bubbles Flotation frothers Sampling Modeling Résumé : The bubble surface area flux, SB, defined as the ration between the superficial gas rate JG and the Sauter mean bubble diameter D32, has been widely used to describe the gas phase dispersion efficiency in flotation machines, and from this predict flotation performance, notable mineral recovery to forecast plant economics.
In this work, results of bubble size distribution (BSD) generated in a pilot column are analyzed. Using video and image analysis techniques, the impact of different sampling rates on the BSD was evaluated. Measurements were carried out for D32 = 1–2 mm, JG = 0.5–1.5 cm/s and two frother concentration, with a maximum sampling rate of 100 fps. In addition, the bubble rise velocity in the bubble swarm was measured, as a function of the individual bubble diameter, for different operational conditions.
The identification of the BSD depends on the proper selection of the visual field and sampling rate for acquisition and processing of bubble images. Distortion in the estimation occurs because a larger holdup of small bubbles is observed, relative to the overall data set, due to their lower velocity.
The actual BSD was obtained by correcting the observed population, considering the effect of bubble rise velocity. Thus, the actual bubble surface area flux, SB, was calculated. The results were evaluated at a pilot scale (air–water system) as well as an industrial plant scale (air-pulp system).DEWEY : 622 ISSN : 0892-6875 En ligne : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687510000257 [article] Estimation of the actual bubble surface area flux in flotation [texte imprimé] / J. Leiva, Auteur ; L. Vinnett, Auteur ; F. Contreras, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 888–894.
Génie Minier
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Minerals engineering > Vol. 23 N° 11-13 (Octobre 2010) . - pp. 888–894
Mots-clés : Froth flotation Flotation bubbles Flotation frothers Sampling Modeling Résumé : The bubble surface area flux, SB, defined as the ration between the superficial gas rate JG and the Sauter mean bubble diameter D32, has been widely used to describe the gas phase dispersion efficiency in flotation machines, and from this predict flotation performance, notable mineral recovery to forecast plant economics.
In this work, results of bubble size distribution (BSD) generated in a pilot column are analyzed. Using video and image analysis techniques, the impact of different sampling rates on the BSD was evaluated. Measurements were carried out for D32 = 1–2 mm, JG = 0.5–1.5 cm/s and two frother concentration, with a maximum sampling rate of 100 fps. In addition, the bubble rise velocity in the bubble swarm was measured, as a function of the individual bubble diameter, for different operational conditions.
The identification of the BSD depends on the proper selection of the visual field and sampling rate for acquisition and processing of bubble images. Distortion in the estimation occurs because a larger holdup of small bubbles is observed, relative to the overall data set, due to their lower velocity.
The actual BSD was obtained by correcting the observed population, considering the effect of bubble rise velocity. Thus, the actual bubble surface area flux, SB, was calculated. The results were evaluated at a pilot scale (air–water system) as well as an industrial plant scale (air-pulp system).DEWEY : 622 ISSN : 0892-6875 En ligne : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687510000257