The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management / Kevin Linderman in Journal of operations management, Vol. 28 N° 4 (Juillet 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of operations management > Vol. 28 N° 4 (Juillet 2010) . - pp. 357–366 Titre : The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Kevin Linderman, Auteur ; Aravind Chandrasekaran, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 357–366 Note générale : Génie Industriel Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Knowledge Citation analysis Co-citations interpretive methods Inter-disciplinary exchange among disciplines Résumé : A number of studies have investigated the quality of journals in Operations Management. This research steps back from these studies and investigates the exchange of ideas within Operations Management journals and between other management disciplines (Management, Marketing, and Finance) during the last decade (1998–2007). Journal citation metrics provide a measure for the exchange of scholarly ideas. Operations Management (OM) journals show a willingness to cross-pollinate ideas with other management disciplines. But, they also tend to have a higher level of self citations and lower level of within discipline citation exchanges when compared to other management disciplines. As a result, Operations Management journals may reflect methodological silos in the field that could potentially dampen scholarly exchange. In general, increasing the diversity of scholarly exchanges within Operations Management, and conducting more cross-disciplinary research with other management disciples should improve the scholarly development of Operations Management. DEWEY : 658.57 ISSN : 0272-6963 En ligne : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272696309000916 [article] The scholarly exchange of knowledge in Operations Management [texte imprimé] / Kevin Linderman, Auteur ; Aravind Chandrasekaran, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 357–366. Génie Industriel Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of operations management > Vol. 28 N° 4 (Juillet 2010) . - pp. 357–366 Mots-clés : Knowledge Citation analysis Co-citations interpretive methods Inter-disciplinary exchange among disciplines Résumé : A number of studies have investigated the quality of journals in Operations Management. This research steps back from these studies and investigates the exchange of ideas within Operations Management journals and between other management disciplines (Management, Marketing, and Finance) during the last decade (1998–2007). Journal citation metrics provide a measure for the exchange of scholarly ideas. Operations Management (OM) journals show a willingness to cross-pollinate ideas with other management disciplines. But, they also tend to have a higher level of self citations and lower level of within discipline citation exchanges when compared to other management disciplines. As a result, Operations Management journals may reflect methodological silos in the field that could potentially dampen scholarly exchange. In general, increasing the diversity of scholarly exchanges within Operations Management, and conducting more cross-disciplinary research with other management disciples should improve the scholarly development of Operations Management. DEWEY : 658.57 ISSN : 0272-6963 En ligne : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272696309000916

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire