Les Inscriptions à la Bibliothèque sont ouvertes en
ligne via le site: https://biblio.enp.edu.dz
Les Réinscriptions se font à :
• La Bibliothèque Annexe pour les étudiants en
2ème Année CPST
• La Bibliothèque Centrale pour les étudiants en Spécialités
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les recherches... |
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Vitaliy V. Degtyarev
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Affiner la rechercheReliability-based evaluation of U.S. design provisions for composite steel deck in construction stage / Vitaliy V. Degtyarev in Journal of structural engineering, Vol. 138 N° 3 (Mars 2012)
[article]
in Journal of structural engineering > Vol. 138 N° 3 (Mars 2012) . - pp. 308-317
Titre : Reliability-based evaluation of U.S. design provisions for composite steel deck in construction stage Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Vitaliy V. Degtyarev, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : pp. 308-317 Note générale : Génie Civil Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Decks Structural reliability Load and resistance factor design Allowable stress design Composite steel decks Construction stage First-order reliability method Résumé : This paper presents a reliability-based evaluation of the American National Standards Institute/Steel Deck Institute (ANSI/SDI) C1.0 and Structural Engineering Institute/American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE) 37 design provisions for composite steel decks in the construction stage. Reliability of the allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods at the strength and deflection limit states was evaluated in terms of reliability indices employing the first-order reliability method. A large number of composite slab configurations, which cover the range of slab parameters typically used in the U.S. construction practice, were investigated. Obtained results demonstrate that the current design provisions for steel decks in the construction stage are overconservative. Modifications of the ANSI/SDI C1.0 construction load requirements are proposed. The modified load requirements result in longer maximum unshored construction spans and acceptable reliability. Safety of the deck designed according to the modified load requirements is more uniform across the typical design parameters when compared with the current design provisions. DEWEY : 624.17 ISSN : 0733-9445 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/sto/resource/1/jsendh/v138/i3/p308_s1?isAuthorized=no [article] Reliability-based evaluation of U.S. design provisions for composite steel deck in construction stage [texte imprimé] / Vitaliy V. Degtyarev, Auteur . - 2012 . - pp. 308-317.
Génie Civil
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of structural engineering > Vol. 138 N° 3 (Mars 2012) . - pp. 308-317
Mots-clés : Decks Structural reliability Load and resistance factor design Allowable stress design Composite steel decks Construction stage First-order reliability method Résumé : This paper presents a reliability-based evaluation of the American National Standards Institute/Steel Deck Institute (ANSI/SDI) C1.0 and Structural Engineering Institute/American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE) 37 design provisions for composite steel decks in the construction stage. Reliability of the allowable stress design (ASD) and load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods at the strength and deflection limit states was evaluated in terms of reliability indices employing the first-order reliability method. A large number of composite slab configurations, which cover the range of slab parameters typically used in the U.S. construction practice, were investigated. Obtained results demonstrate that the current design provisions for steel decks in the construction stage are overconservative. Modifications of the ANSI/SDI C1.0 construction load requirements are proposed. The modified load requirements result in longer maximum unshored construction spans and acceptable reliability. Safety of the deck designed according to the modified load requirements is more uniform across the typical design parameters when compared with the current design provisions. DEWEY : 624.17 ISSN : 0733-9445 En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/sto/resource/1/jsendh/v138/i3/p308_s1?isAuthorized=no