Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur

Evaluating surfactants and their effect on methane mole fraction during hydrate growth / Jonathan Verrett in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, Vol. 51 N° 40 (Octobre 2012) 

Public ISBD [article]  in Industrial & engineering chemistry research > Vol. 51 N° 40 (Octobre 2012) . - pp. 13144-13149 Titre : Evaluating surfactants and their effect on methane mole fraction during hydrate growth Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jonathan Verrett, Auteur ; Phillip Servio, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : pp. 13144-13149 Note générale : Industrial chemistry Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Surfactant Résumé : Little work has been done to characterize the effects of surfactant concentration on hydrate growth. The focus of this study is to investigate the effects of gemini and conventional surfadants on hydrate growth and evaluate growth promotion of a variety of surfactants in a consistent manner. The effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and DOWFAX 8390 surfactants on methane hydrates formed in a stirred 600 cm3 reactor containing 343 cm3 of liquid were investigated. Solubility experiments under liquid―hydrate―gas equilibria were conducted at 275.1K with pure water and solutions of each surfactant. Kinetic experiments were performed at 275.1 K and 4545 kPa with surfactant concentrations ranging from 0 to 1150 ppm for SDS and 0 to 200 ppm for DOWFAX 8390. Methane mole fraction measurements were taken at various times throughout the kinetic experiments. Both surfactants were found to have no effect on methane solubility in a gas―liquid―hydrate system at equilibrium. The surfactants did however have a pronounced effect on bulk methane mole fraction during kinetic experiments at surfactant concentrations that significantly promoted hydrate growth. Average hydrate growth rate was measured at various surfactant concentrations, and a sigmoidal trend was observed for both surfactants. Data showed a smooth rather than instantaneous increase in growth rate. A mathematical model is proposed and applied to compare the effectiveness of both surfactants at promoting hydrate growth. DOWFAX 8390 and SDS solutions both promote growth more than 4.5 times that of water samples, but DOWFAX 8390 achieves this promotion at 1/4 the concentration of SDS and has a larger increase in promotion per unit mass of surfactant added. The role of surfactants at the hydrate―liquid and gas―liquid interfaces is discussed. ISSN : 0888-5885 En ligne : http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=26451463 [article] Evaluating surfactants and their effect on methane mole fraction during hydrate growth [texte imprimé] / Jonathan Verrett, Auteur ; Phillip Servio, Auteur . - 2012 . - pp. 13144-13149. Industrial chemistry Langues : Anglais (eng) in Industrial & engineering chemistry research > Vol. 51 N° 40 (Octobre 2012) . - pp. 13144-13149 Mots-clés : Surfactant Résumé : Little work has been done to characterize the effects of surfactant concentration on hydrate growth. The focus of this study is to investigate the effects of gemini and conventional surfadants on hydrate growth and evaluate growth promotion of a variety of surfactants in a consistent manner. The effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and DOWFAX 8390 surfactants on methane hydrates formed in a stirred 600 cm3 reactor containing 343 cm3 of liquid were investigated. Solubility experiments under liquid―hydrate―gas equilibria were conducted at 275.1K with pure water and solutions of each surfactant. Kinetic experiments were performed at 275.1 K and 4545 kPa with surfactant concentrations ranging from 0 to 1150 ppm for SDS and 0 to 200 ppm for DOWFAX 8390. Methane mole fraction measurements were taken at various times throughout the kinetic experiments. Both surfactants were found to have no effect on methane solubility in a gas―liquid―hydrate system at equilibrium. The surfactants did however have a pronounced effect on bulk methane mole fraction during kinetic experiments at surfactant concentrations that significantly promoted hydrate growth. Average hydrate growth rate was measured at various surfactant concentrations, and a sigmoidal trend was observed for both surfactants. Data showed a smooth rather than instantaneous increase in growth rate. A mathematical model is proposed and applied to compare the effectiveness of both surfactants at promoting hydrate growth. DOWFAX 8390 and SDS solutions both promote growth more than 4.5 times that of water samples, but DOWFAX 8390 achieves this promotion at 1/4 the concentration of SDS and has a larger increase in promotion per unit mass of surfactant added. The role of surfactants at the hydrate―liquid and gas―liquid interfaces is discussed. ISSN : 0888-5885 En ligne : http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=26451463