Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur

Validation / Patrick J. Roache in Transactions of the ASME . Journal of fluids engineering, Vol. 131 N° 3 (Mars 2009) 

Public ISBD [article]  in Transactions of the ASME . Journal of fluids engineering > Vol. 131 N° 3 (Mars 2009) . - 04 p. Titre : Validation : what does it mean? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Patrick J. Roache, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : 04 p. Note générale : fluids engineering Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : flow  (dynamics);  turbulence;  engineers;  accreditation;  computational  fluid  dynamics;  design;  modeling;  calibration;  model  validation;  regulations;  Reynolds-averaged  Navier–Stokes  equations Résumé : Ambiguities, inconsistencies, and recommended interpretations of the commonly cited definition of validation for computational fluid dynamics codes/models are examined. It is shown that the definition-deduction approach is prone to misinterpretation, and that bottom-up descriptions rather than top-down legalistic definitions are to be preferred for science-based engineering and journal policies, though legalistic definitions are necessary for contracts. En ligne : http://fluidsengineering.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/issue.aspx?journalid=122 [...] [article] Validation : what does it mean? [texte imprimé] / Patrick J. Roache, Auteur . - 2009 . - 04 p. fluids engineering Langues : Anglais (eng) in Transactions of the ASME . Journal of fluids engineering > Vol. 131 N° 3 (Mars 2009) . - 04 p. Mots-clés : flow  (dynamics);  turbulence;  engineers;  accreditation;  computational  fluid  dynamics;  design;  modeling;  calibration;  model  validation;  regulations;  Reynolds-averaged  Navier–Stokes  equations Résumé : Ambiguities, inconsistencies, and recommended interpretations of the commonly cited definition of validation for computational fluid dynamics codes/models are examined. It is shown that the definition-deduction approach is prone to misinterpretation, and that bottom-up descriptions rather than top-down legalistic definitions are to be preferred for science-based engineering and journal policies, though legalistic definitions are necessary for contracts. En ligne : http://fluidsengineering.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/issue.aspx?journalid=122 [...]