Quantification of model uncertainty in shear strength predictions for fiber-reinforced sand / Shadi S. Najjar in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol. 139 N° 1 (Janvier 2013)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 139 N° 1 (Janvier 2013) . - pp. 116-133 Titre : Quantification of model uncertainty in shear strength predictions for fiber-reinforced sand Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Shadi S. Najjar, Auteur ; Salah Sadek, Auteur ; Alexander Alcovero, Auteur Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : pp. 116-133 Note générale : geotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : fiber reinforced materials  sand (soil type)  shear strength  uncertainty principles Résumé : Several models have been suggested to estimate the improvement brought by fibers to the shear strength of fiber-reinforced sands. To date, the effectiveness and reliability of these models have not been the subject of a comprehensive evaluation. The objectives of this paper are to (1) compile the experimental data available in the literature on the behavior of fiber-reinforced sands into a comprehensive state-of-the-art database, (2) quantify the model uncertainty and bias of current strength prediction models for fiber-reinforced sands, and (3) provide insight regarding possible modifications that could be made to the formulation of available models to improve their predictive effectiveness and reduce their model uncertainty. Two models that are considered to present the best available approaches to predicting sand-fiber shear strength were evaluated, namely, the “energy-based” model and the “discrete” model. The energy-based model was found to underestimate the measured friction coefficient on average by about 10%, while the discrete model overestimated the friction coefficient by 6%, with associated coefficients of variation on bias values of 0.20 and 0.17, respectively. With the introduction of minor modifications to these models, the average bias error was eliminated, and the coefficients of variation in the ratio of predicted to measured shear strength (bias) were reduced to 0.17 and 0.12, respectively, for the two models. En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0000742 [article] Quantification of model uncertainty in shear strength predictions for fiber-reinforced sand [texte imprimé] / Shadi S. Najjar, Auteur ; Salah Sadek, Auteur ; Alexander Alcovero, Auteur . - 2013 . - pp. 116-133. geotechnique Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering > Vol. 139 N° 1 (Janvier 2013) . - pp. 116-133 Mots-clés : fiber reinforced materials  sand (soil type)  shear strength  uncertainty principles Résumé : Several models have been suggested to estimate the improvement brought by fibers to the shear strength of fiber-reinforced sands. To date, the effectiveness and reliability of these models have not been the subject of a comprehensive evaluation. The objectives of this paper are to (1) compile the experimental data available in the literature on the behavior of fiber-reinforced sands into a comprehensive state-of-the-art database, (2) quantify the model uncertainty and bias of current strength prediction models for fiber-reinforced sands, and (3) provide insight regarding possible modifications that could be made to the formulation of available models to improve their predictive effectiveness and reduce their model uncertainty. Two models that are considered to present the best available approaches to predicting sand-fiber shear strength were evaluated, namely, the “energy-based” model and the “discrete” model. The energy-based model was found to underestimate the measured friction coefficient on average by about 10%, while the discrete model overestimated the friction coefficient by 6%, with associated coefficients of variation on bias values of 0.20 and 0.17, respectively. With the introduction of minor modifications to these models, the average bias error was eliminated, and the coefficients of variation in the ratio of predicted to measured shear strength (bias) were reduced to 0.17 and 0.12, respectively, for the two models. En ligne : http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0000742

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire